mindly.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mindly.Social is an English speaking, friendly Mastodon instance created for people who want to use their brains and their hearts to make social networking more social. 🧠💖

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.2K
active users

Google to end online news access in Canada in response to the Online News Act

theguardian.com/technology/202

Please provide me with arguments about why this is a good idea. I have a tenuous understanding of Canadian law and am leaning towards it not being a good idea.

The GuardianGoogle to end news access in Canada after bill to pay news publishers passesBy Johana Bhuiyan
C.

@highvizghilliesuit

It isn't a good idea. It's a idea that in latched on to to show they're "standing up to big US tech companies", and which the big Canadian backed as (what they thought would be) a big cash cow.

I'm 100% with you that the has no business deciding what qualifies as "".

Canadian media companies are going to see their traffic drop 50-80% - including the ones with no seat at the negotiating table.

@cazabon I'm all for people getting paid fairly, and regulating industries to do so if need be. But every attempt I've seen to do this with the news media industry inevitably runs into some weird free speech stuff.

In the U.S. there was a (failed) proposal to give everyone a ~$300 tax rebate to spend on news subscriptions. Maybe I'm being absurd, but IMO unless you can spend that money on like Fortnite skins and porno mags, I don't know how you can claim to have a "free press."

@cazabon on second thought, there's probably some sane middle ground, at least theoretically.

@highvizghilliesuit

Copyright covers it.

Search/social media companies show a of the , and back to the original to read the full . That's fine, and shouldn't need .

But if they're more of the original article than is necessary for that purpose, eliminating those visits to the original site and benefiting , they're the site's , and should pay and for that.

@highvizghilliesuit

I think we're on the same page here. I think bill C-18 is ludicrous and self-destructive and contrary to how the 'net/web has worked from its inception.

And I don't believe the should be saying what is or isn't , or who can and cannot /#broadcast. And since the purpose of broadcast was to share a limited (), and the doesn't have that limitation, shouldn't be involved in the internet at all.